|
"How
Safe is Your Hospital" (c) Consumer Reports,
January, 2003
21,000 Consumer Reports readers rate the
care they or a relative received. What we learned
can make a critical difference for you.

The quality of care you
receive during a hospital stay can determine how
quickly and how well you recover--or if you recover
at all. You might expect consistently good care to
be delivered at almost every hospital in a nation
with the world's top doctors, most advanced
technology, and highest per-capita spending on
health care. But when we surveyed and invited
e-mails from Consumer Reports readers about
their recent hospital experiences, we found enormous
variations. They ranged from an Alabama man's
smooth-sailing, lifesaving, $1.5 million liver
transplant to an 83-year-old Tennessee man's death
after a careless emergency-room staff sent him home
without treating the broken bones and internal
injuries he had suffered from falling down the
basement stairs.
Just how dramatically the quality of hospital care
can affect your outcome was driven home to one
reader, Kate Parks, 25, from Denver, when she needed
surgery twice in one month for a detached retina.
Both surgeries were performed by the same doctor,
but for scheduling reasons the two procedures took
place in different hospitals, comparable in size and
facilities. At the first hospital, it took so long
for anyone to answer Parks' call for assistance when
she awoke after surgery that she nearly fainted
while getting out of bed to use the bathroom. In
contrast, after her surgery at the second hospital,
a nurse not only answered her call, but also
discovered the reason for Parks'
lightheadedness--low blood pressure--which she
treated with extra intravenous fluids. "The first
time, it took me at least two or three days after I
went home before I felt OK again," Parks says. "With
better care the second time, I felt much better,
much sooner."
Robert Brook, M.D., director of the RAND Health
Institute in Santa Monica, Calif., put the matter
bluntly: "Most people will just go to wherever their
doctor hospitalizes them. But the hospital you're in
absolutely makes a huge difference."
If, like 55 percent of our survey respondents, you
have a choice of which hospital to use, this article
explains the information you need to select wisely
and where to find it. If you don't have a choice of
hospitals because you're admitted for an emergency
or the hospital is dictated by your health plan or
doctor, we explain how to work around problem areas
to make sure you get the best possible care.
AT RISK FOR BAD CARE

AN ACCIDENTAL COMPARISONKate
Parks' back-to-back eye operations at two
Denver-area hospitals were performed by the
same surgeon, but her experiences were very
different. At the first hospital, "very
harried and uncaring nurses," she says,
neglected her comfort and didn't answer her
call bell in time to prevent her from nearly
fainting when she got up to use the
bathroom. At the second hospital, with
attentive nursing care and attention to
small details, like providing enough
pillows, she says, "I was hugely more
comfortable and felt so much better, so much
sooner."
Photo by Jeff
Stine |
|
A total of 21,144 readers
told us about their own recent hospitalization or
that of a close family member. Those who were less
than highly satisfied with their hospital--22
percent--complained more often of unanswered calls
for assistance, inadequate pain relief, pressure to
leave the hospital too soon, or recovery prolonged
by complications caused by the hospitalization.
The remaining 78 percent of respondents were highly
satisfied with their stay. Overall, readers rated
their hospital experiences higher than our survey
respondents have rated service in banks,
restaurants, or hotel chains. But unlike most other
services, the care you get at a hospital can have
serious long-term consequences, so any risk of
receiving substandard care must be taken seriously.
Hospital studies show, for example, that your odds
of dying of a heart attack or in the intensive-care
unit in the worst American hospitals are two times
greater than in the best hospitals.
So how can you tell whether your local hospitals are
up to par? The experiences of our survey
respondents, together with research studies and
interviews with experts across the nation, helped us
to identify three crucial factors: Sufficient staff
(especially registered nurses), good systems for
organizing care, and lots of experience with your
particular medical condition seem to make the most
difference in both patient satisfaction and
recovery.
Interestingly, the type of insurance you have does
not. In our survey, the experiences of patients
whose bills were paid by health maintenance
organizations (HMOs) were every bit as good as those
covered by fee-for-service or preferred-provider
plans. The only way in which HMO patients stood out:
Their out-of-pocket costs were by far the lowest.
But the type of condition for which you are admitted
does affect your risk of having a bad experience.
People hospitalized for nonsurgical treatment seem
to be more at risk for poor care than those treated
surgically or in the hospital to have a baby. In our
survey, people who received nonsurgical treatment
for diseases such as respiratory illness, heart
failure, or cancer reported more problems with pain
relief and lower satisfaction with care than did
patients who had surgery.
"People who come in for surgery have an idea of what
to expect, and their care is coordinated by a team,"
explains Susan Edgman-Levitan, P.A., a fellow at
Boston's nonprofit Institute for Health Care
Improvement. "In contrast, most people on medical
wards are older, with complicated, multiple, chronic
conditions for which there isn't a predictable
course of treatment." Those patients are often
treated by a doctor who doesn't know much about them
and who has to wade through a foot-thick chart to
find needed information.
Patricia Seidle, age 36, who has insulin-dependent
diabetes and severe heart disease, has almost come
to expect uncoordinated care from the Pennsylvania
hospital where she is a regular inpatient. "Every
time I go in, they don't give me my insulin," she
says. One time Seidle's blood sugar rose to 425
milligrams per deciliter (normal is between 60 and
110 mg/dL) before she was given insulin. Nonsurgical
patients and their families need to be particularly
careful to follow the recommendations below, which
can help them work around hospital deficiencies.
FOR WANT OF A NURSE'

IN SEARCH OF PAIN RELIEFHospitalized
for a week with a serious infection
following arthroscopic knee surgery,
John-Michael Kramer, 54, repeatedly endured
long waits for pain medication. "The nursing
care was so poor, they'd take 45 minutes to
an hour to show up" after he asked for pain
relief, Kramer recalls. To add to his
troubles, he developed a herniated disc in
his back, which he blames on a sagging
hospital mattress.
Photo
by Cade Martin |
|
 |
| |
Of all the factors measured
in the Consumer Reports survey,
satisfaction with care and attention from nurses,
doctors, and other hospital staff members made the
most difference by far in overall satisfaction.
Moreover, only 2 percent of the survey respondents
who reported attentive nursing care ended up with a
serious health complication, compared with 8 percent
of those who found it more difficult to get a nurse
to help them.
Other evidence confirms our finding that the care
that keeps patients happy also improves their health
outcomes. The lower the patient-to-nurse ratio, the
lower the risk of common hospital-related
complications, such as urinary-tract infection,
pneumonia, or gastrointestinal bleeding, researchers
from the Harvard School of Public Health reported
last spring in The New England Journal of Medicine.
The study showed that alert nursing care made a
life-or-death difference. Hospitals with ample nurse
staffing had 9.4 percent fewer cases of cardiac
arrest and shock than hospitals with lower staffing
levels.
And the risk of death is directly related to a
nurse's caseload. Every additional patient over four
increases the risk of death following surgery by 7
percent, according to a study of 232,342 surgical
patients in 168 Pennsylvania hospitals, published
last fall in the Journal of the American Medical
Association.
But just 60 percent of our survey respondents said
unequivocally that their hospital was adequately
staffed, and only 55 percent strongly agreed that
nurses responded promptly to calls for help.
Michelle Kellett, of Rochester, N.Y., says when her
grandmother was hospitalized, "The nurses had about
14 patients each." The staff were spread so thin
that nurses failed to keep a written record of one
of the medications her grandmother received, and
they sent her home with a bedsore on her heel so bad
that she spent three extra weeks in a rehabilitation
facility.
This is not an isolated incident. The shortage of
nurses--particularly registered nurses--and other
staff at the nation's hospitals has reached critical
proportions. On average, 13 percent of nursing
positions at U.S. hospitals are unfilled, with some
hospitals reporting vacancy rates of more than 20
percent. And the pressures of working in
understaffed units is making hospital jobs less
desirable. Hospital administrators report that
despite strenuous recruiting efforts, higher
salaries, and sign-on bonuses of up to $10,000, they
are having more and more trouble filling their
nursing positions.
HOSPITAL-CAUSED
ILLNESS

ADVICE FROM AN
EXPERIENCED R.N.After
16 years in nursing, Sylvia Steiger has
plenty of ideas about how to improve your
hospital stay. "My biggest piece of advice
is to have someone with the patient to make
those obnoxious demands," she says. Another
tip: Bring a complete list of medications
with you, including name, dose, and
administration schedule. But she says the
main quality variable is one patients can't
control: the nurse-patient ratio.
Photo
by Kevin Poch |
|
Even in well-staffed
hospitals, care can suffer because of inefficient
systems and poor communication. A 2001 study of
health-care quality by the National Academy of
Sciences said the mismatch between America's highly
advanced medical technology and the chaotic system
used to deliver it is "the medical equivalent of
manufacturing microprocessors in a vacuum-tube
factory."
The result: From 3 to 4 percent of hospital patients
experience some kind of "adverse event" caused by
medical error or mismanagement, major studies have
found. In our survey, 12 percent of the respondents
said they were aware of a medication error,
misdiagnosis, or similar problem during their stay.
For 5 percent of all respondents, such problems led
to serious health complications.
Problems with medication delivery in hospitals have
been well documented. For instance, in a study of 36
randomly selected hospitals in Georgia and Colorado,
reported in the Archives of Internal Medicine,
researchers directly observed hospital staff
administering medications. They found
mistakes--including staff forgetting to give the
medication, giving an unauthorized drug, and giving
a drug at the wrong time or in the wrong dose--in 19
percent of the doses given.
Six percent of our survey respondents reported
developing an infection during or within one week of
their hospital stay. Knowing a hospital's infection
rate might be a good way to rate the quality of its
care. But this information, though collected by
hospitals and accrediting groups, is not released to
the public.
IT STILL HURTS
Inadequate pain relief is one of
the most disturbing consequences of overworked and
poorly organized staff. In our survey, 37 percent of
all respondents, and 49 percent of the nonsurgical
patients, reported suboptimal pain relief.
John-Michael Kramer, a 54-year-old government
consultant from Maryland, ran into both
organizational and understaffing problems when he
was hospitalized for a week with a knee that had
become severely infected following arthroscopic
surgery. Rather than receiving medication on a
regular schedule, a widely recommended procedure
that would have kept his agonizing pain under better
control, Kramer was required to ask for every dose.
"I'd hit my call button, but the nurses would take
45 minutes to an hour to show up," he recalls. "I
finally hit on the tactic of calling the hospital
switchboard and asking them to patch me through to
the nurse's station on my ward."
Experiences such as Kramer's are the
all-too-predictable result of nurse understaffing,
says Patricia Rowell, R.N., senior policy fellow at
the American Nurses Association. "When you're faced
with a patient who wants a pain pill and another who
is bleeding, the life-threatening situation is going
to get attention first," Rowell says.
Better systems, such as making sure that doctors
order pain medications in advance or that hospitals
provide "patient-controlled analgesia" machines that
enable you to safely administer your own pain
medication, can reduce nursing labor and make prompt
pain relief available.
"There are both medical and financial arguments in
favor of treating pain," says Dennis Turk, Ph.D., a
professor of anesthesiology and pain research at the
University of Washington. "When their pain is well
controlled, people get out of the hospital faster.
When they have a lot of pain, they recover more
slowly and with more complications." Yet
deficiencies in pain control persist despite reform
efforts and national guidelines developed by
phalanxes of experts, going back two decades or
more.
THE IMPORTANCE OF
EXPERIENCE Along with
good systems management and adequate staffing, the
amount of experience a hospital or doctor has with a
particular health condition seems to play a key role
in the quality of care delivered. For many
procedures and conditions, research shows that the
more cases a hospital handles, the better the
patients fare.
A 2002 study headed by John Birkmeyer, M.D., chief
of general surgery at Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical
Center, found that the risk of death following
surgery for pancreatic cancer--an especially
difficult operation--is 360 percent greater at the
lowest-volume hospitals than at the highest-volume
ones.
In general, the experience of the hospital and
surgeon are most important for uncommon,
complicated, and inherently dangerous procedures,
such as surgery for esophageal or pancreatic cancer,
experts say. Most hospitals have plenty of
experience with more common operations, such as hip
replacement, breast-cancer surgery, hysterectomy,
and appendectomy.
"If you're having your hernia fixed or your blood
pressure dealt with, volume probably doesn't
matter," says R. Adams Dudley, M.D., assistant
professor of medicine and health policy at the
University of California-San Francisco. "But if
you've got an aneurysm in your brain or your kid has
spina bifida, you're better off with a high-volume
specialist."
For some surgeries, experience may not be a matter
of life or death, but it still affects results. In
prostate removal, for example, the mortality risk is
fairly low, but the risk of bad functional outcomes,
such as impotence and incontinence, seems to be
lower with more experienced surgeons, notes
Birkmeyer.
Fortunately, some hospital "report cards" now give
consumers information on the volume of particular
surgeries they perform.
RECOMMENDATIONS
The nation's $450-billion-a-year
hospital industry includes some 6,000 institutions
employing more than 5 million people. All too aware
of its shortcomings, the industry is constantly
undertaking self-improvement programs. For instance,
its powerful accrediting agency, the Joint
Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare
Organizations, announced last summer that all
hospitals are required to have systems in place to
prevent patient identification mix-ups and
medication errors.
But you can not and should not rely on
quality-improvement programs to protect you. Here
are steps that patients and their family members can
take to improve their chances of surviving and
thriving after a hospital stay.
Make an informed choice. Among the
most satisfied patients in our survey were the 20
percent who chose their hospital based on a good
previous experience or because it had a good
reputation. In a growing number of states and
localities, it's now possible to judge hospital
quality based not only on word-of-mouth but also on
hard facts in publicly available hospital report
cards that contain information on volume, mortality
rates, and adverse outcomes.
For a list of available report cards and advice on
how to use them, see
Hospital report cards.
Just 30 of the respondents to our questionnaire said
they picked their hospital based mainly on a public
report card. "People aren't used to having this
information, so they don't think to use it," says
Judith Hibbard, Dr.P.H., a professor of health
policy at the University of Oregon who is studying
ways to make the report cards more useful and
understandable.
The bad news is that report cards aren't available
in all areas. Neither is information on several of
the key factors we've identified. Hospitals don't
routinely measure coordination of care, adequacy of
pain relief, error rates, or functional outcomes.
Hospitals know the size of their nursing staffs.
But, says Patricia Rowell, senior policy fellow at
the American Nurses Association, "it's sensitive
information that hospitals do not wish to share."
The American Hospital Association collects annual
information on nurse staffing levels, but this
information is available only to customers willing
to purchase a costly database.
Plan ahead. Most hospitals have
clinical "pathways" for various conditions, and
consumers should ask for a copy, says Edgman-Levitan,
of the Institute for Health Care Improvement. "Then
you know what to expect, and if something doesn't
happen in the right sequence, you and your family
can let someone know about it," she says.
Our survey respondents were generally satisfied with
the presurgical information they received. And 97
percent said the surgeon explained the surgery in a
way they or their relative could understand.
Advance planning is a good way to ensure
postsurgical pain relief. After suffering
excruciating pain during a stay in a Texas hospital
following a total knee replacement, Consumer
Reports reader Mary Stark Love, age 54, was
determined not to have the same problem when the
knee needed surgery again. "I researched pain
management and talked with my surgeon about pain
control, and he was totally sympathetic to my
concerns," she says. The advance planning worked:
Her pain stayed in check, and her recovery went much
faster than after the first surgery.
Bring your own medical history. "I
can't count the number of times I've admitted a
patient to the hospital and asked them what meds
they take, only to receive a reply like 'a
blood-pressure pill in the mornings, a heart pill at
dinner, and something for my arthritis,'" says Paula
Estey, R.N., an Oregon intensive-care nurse.
In your wallet, carry an up-to-date list of your
medication names and dosages; insurance information;
names and phone numbers of your regular physicians;
and key elements of your medical history, such as
diabetes or a recent stroke.
Bring your own help. Patients,
nurses, and national quality experts concur: Given
the shortage of nurses, the most important thing to
bring with you to the hospital is a reliable family
member or friend to run interference for you.
"No one who is basically helpless--a child, a person
with a cognitive impairment, a person who cannot
ambulate, a person who is sedated--should be left
alone in the hospital unless they are in intensive
care," says Kathleen Maynard, a Florida nurse who
saw her Alzheimer's-afflicted father through four
hospital stays in three years. "I am speaking as
both an R.N. and a family caregiver. Hospital
staffing is so strained that patients do not get the
care they need."
The job of the family caregiver can range from
chasing down forgotten meals to alerting someone
about a worrisome symptom. For example, when Kristen
Fulton's father was hospitalized for pneumonia in
Ohio, she and other family members took turns
staying with him. They stepped in when a nurse
brought him the incorrect medication. "I don't like
to think what might have happened if one of us
weren't there looking after him," she says.
Another option, elected by 2 percent of our
respondents, is to hire a private-duty nurse as a
"sitter" for times when family or friends can't be
there. For a list of available nurses, try your
hospital or local home-health-care agency. Be aware,
though, that insurance rarely covers this service.
Know the staff, and make sure they know you.
Keep a list of current doctors and nurses where both
you and family members can see it. If you don't
recognize the health-care professional at your
bedside, ask who he or she is. Also make sure all
staff members check your identification bracelet
before giving medication or taking you away for a
test.
Write things down. Keep a notebook
at your bedside, accessible to you and your family
caregivers. Write down information such as
medication changes, questions for the doctor and
notes about his or her visit, and any significant
changes in your condition. Be especially vigilant
during transitions from one type of care to
another--from intensive care to a regular unit, or
from a hospital to a nursing home, for example.
Mistakes are especially likely to occur at those
times.
Double-check your medications. Ask
what the medication is before you take it; if you
have doubts, insist that the staff double-check the
order. Sylvia Steiger, a nurse from Wyoming, says
she is never insulted when a patient does this.
"Usually, the doctor has changed the medication or
dose, and I am able to explain that to the patient,"
she says. "Rarely, I have read something wrong--I'm
a good nurse but far from perfect."
Be assertive about pain relief. Ask
your doctor whether you are eligible for a
patient-controlled analgesia machine. If you're the
caregiver, don't be shy about demanding that pain
medicine be given on time; it's much more difficult
to get pain under control once it has become severe.
And don't forget that nonsurgical patients are often
in significant pain.
Help nurses work efficiently. Find
out when the hospital nursing shift changes, and try
to avoid asking for anything complicated immediately
after a new shift starts; nurses are especially busy
then, catching up on their patients. "Batch
nonurgent requests into one call-light summons,"
suggests Estey, the Oregon nurse. And don't be
insulted if a clerk or aide responds to your call;
his or her job is to separate requests that need
nursing attention from those that don't.
Keep visitors under control."Well-meaning
friends and relatives simply don't realize how
tiring they can be, and the patient is usually too
polite to say, 'I'm exhausted, go away,'" says
Steiger. Keep down the number of calls that family
members make to the nursing station; designate one
contact person to call for updates on the patient's
condition, and organize a phone tree.
Plan your discharge. You should
start preparing for discharge practically as soon as
you're admitted, says Edgman-Levitan. "Start talking
to the staff about what you'll be able to do when
you go home and what kind of services you'll need."
Under pressure from managed care, hospitals are
moving faster than ever to discharge patients as
soon as they no longer need intensive hospital
technology and nursing care. Seven percent of our
survey respondents said the hospital tried to
discharge them or their family member before they
felt physically ready to leave. It pays to be
assertive. About half of our respondents appealed
their early discharge, and of those, two-thirds were
allowed to stay longer.
Before you leave, make sure you receive a formal
discharge plan from the hospital that includes
provisions for follow-up care, such as doctor
visits, home care, or transfer to a nursing home or
rehabilitation hospital. The plan should also give
explicit instructions about medication, wound care,
any limits on physical activity, dietary
restrictions, and which symptoms are to be expected
and which are cause for concern. |